Advocacy
MDDCSAM & OUTCOMES OF 2026 STATE BILLS:
(Update 4/17/2026)
2026 BILLS SUPPORTED BY MDDCSAM WHICH PASSED:
PASSED:
HB 1249 ‘Certified Recovery Residences – Refusing Services to Individuals Receiving Medication-Assisted Treatment – Prohibition’
(Initiated by MDDCSAM to prohibit certified recovery houses from limiting or prohibiting access to medications for opioid use disorder: ‘MOUD.’ In the words of the bill, prohibits “denying services to individuals receiving medication-assisted treatment for opioid use disorder or requiring them to stop or alter their treatment as a condition of admission.” This common practice has jeopardized recovery, likely increased fatal overdose, and has been described as “practicing medicine without a license.” It results from stigma and misunderstanding of life-saving MOUD, and perpetuates this stigma. The MD Dept. of Health will no longer be able to continue granting and renewing certifications for recovery houses that discriminate in this way; MD is now one of only a few states that has established this as a certification standard. We overcame arguments that the bill was unnecessary because MOUD discrimination is already illegal under federal law. However, federal enforcement is non-existent, and has never been used to protect MOUD access in recovery residences).
PASSED:
HB 838 State Board of Pharmacy – Prescriber-Pharmacist Agreements
X-file bill SB 562
(This will likely improve access to buprenorphine, the only medication affected by the bill. At least 10 states allow pharmacists to prescribe controlled substances under collaborative practice agreements with medical providers. However, in Maryland, pharmacists do not “prescribe” under these agreements. Instead, they can “order” medication following a protocol authorized by the prescriber to start, stop medication, modify dosages and order labs such as drug screens in specified circumstances. Studies of these agreements used for OUD treatment have shown high rates of patient retention, satisfaction and opioid-negative drug screens. ASAM has a Public Policy Statement in support of these agreements).
MDDCSAM’s testimony in SUPPORT
PASSED:
HB 746 ‘Maryland Medical Assistance Program and Health Insurance – Collaborative Care Model – Cost Sharing Prohibition’
X-file bill: SB 428
(The bill prohibits the MD Dept of Health and many insurance carriers from charging patients a copayment or deductible for services in the Collaborative Care model. It appears that these fees have caused most patients to drop out of the program after the first visit. Otherwise, this is an evidence-based model that reimburses a psychiatric provider or addiction medicine specialist, a primary care provider and a co-located behavioral health case manager for team-based care. The specialists interact with the primary care by phone or virtually, do not see patients directly, and are reimbursed without the need to participate with Maryland Medicaid. The original plan was limited to psychiatric consultants, but MDDCSAM successfully added addiction medicine specialists through an amendment in 2018. It was launched in Maryland in 2020 for patients receiving primary care but lacking behavioral health treatment).
MDDCSAM’s testimony in SUPPORT
PASSED:
SB 249 ‘Tobacco Product Licensees – Additional Licensure for Electronic Smoking Devices’
(No cross-file bill)
(Establishes a separate license for the manufacturer, distribution or sale of Electronic Smoking Devices (ESDs) which would facilitate tracking and compliance with regulations. Though up to 85% of e-cigarette devices sold in U.S. are illegal products, there is essentially no federal enforcement. They remain the most commonly used tobacco product among middle and high school students. Nicotine use disorder among teens and young adults is growing, related to the use of these products, which are also used for illicit substances. ‘Vaping-Associated Pulmonary Injury’ which can lead to intensive care admissions, peaked in 2019 but is still occurring.
See this excellent short animated video on surprising concerns about nicotine vaping)
MDDCSAM testimony in SUPPORT
PASSED:
HB 529 ‘Code Revision – Health – Maryland Medical Assistance Program’
(X-file bill: SB 244)
(The bill replaces, in this section of Maryland statute, the stigmatizing terms “substance abuse” or “alcohol and drug abuse” with “substance use disorder,” and replacing “substance abusing” with “with substance use,” along with other language updates in Maryland Medicaid law. We pointed out the importance of updating de-stigmitizing terminology).
MDDCSAM testimony in SUPPORT
PASSED:
SB 379 ‘Recovery Residence Grant Program – Funding’
(No crossfile bill)
(Extends a $500,000 appropriation for competitive grants through 2030.
See the latest (2025) report on the Recovery Residence Grant Program).
MDDCSAM testimony in SUPPORT
PASSED:
HB 280 Health Insurance – Mental Health and Substance Use Disorders – Codification of Federal Requirements
(X-file bill: SB 205)
(This bill codifies federal requirements for behavioral health parity into Maryland law regarding coverage by state-regulated commercial plans. It clarifies the authority of the Maryland Insurance Administration to enforce the provisions, instead of relying on federal law, i.e., the 1996 Mental Health Parity Act and the 2008 Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act (MHPAEA), which is potentially subject to change and uncertain enforcement. Behavioral health parity is a legal requirement ensuring that health insurance plans provide the same level of coverage for mental health and substance use disorders as they do for physical medical and surgical conditions. Financial requirements such as copays and deductibles, as well as treatment limits like visit caps, must be comparable to and no more restrictive than those applied to physical illnesses. Access to mental health and substance use services is increasingly difficult because many providers are out-of-network. Maryland is among the states with the highest disparity between out-of-network use for behavioral health treatment compared to medical/surgical treatment).
Related: MDDCSAM co-signed these comments by the Legal Action Center to the Maryland Insurance Administration (MIA) to ensure that insurance carriers report their mental health & substance use treatment coverage in a way that ensures that they cover these services as the law requires. For years, carriers have been able to avoid adequate coverage of these services, in large part by not clearly providing their data to the MIA.
2026 BILLS OPPOSED BY MDDCSAM WHICH FAILED:
FAILED:
HB 1386 Criminal Law – Distribution of Heroin or Fentanyl Causing Death or Serious Bodily Injury (Victoria, Scottie, Ashleigh, and Yader’s Law)
(X-file bill: SB 906)
(Would have imposed an additional period of incarceration up to 20 years to anyone who distributes heroin or fentanyl for remuneration that results in death or serious bodily injury. Note that It is already illegal to distribute any controlled and dangerous substance (CDS), or to posses a quantity suggesting an intent to distribute, and periods of incarceration can already be very long. This is an example of “Drug Induced Homicide” laws which are proliferating in other states, emphasizing punitive measures over treatment or harm reduction. These laws tend to punish friends and family of the decedent who commonly share drugs in order to help a loved one avoid intolerable withdrawal symptoms. MDDCSAM provided both written and in-person testimony in opposition to this bill, and a prior version introduced two years ago).
MDCSAM testimony in OPPOSITION
FAILED:
SB 527 Public Health – Ibogaine Clinical Research Grant Program – Establishment (Veterans Mental Health Innovations Act)
(X-file bill: HB 1422)
(The bill would have diverted $500,000 a year for three years from Maryland’s Opioid Restitution Fund for research on ibogaine for OUD. MDDCSAM was also involved in opposing a similar bill with in-person testimony in 2018. For both bills, MCSAM described the lack of evidence for ibogaine as an OUD treatment. The strong desire for alternatives to methadone and buprenorphine may be related to stigma and misunderstanding of these life-saving treatments).
MDDCSAM testimony in OPPOSITION
FAILED:
SB 470 ‘State Board of Physicians – Naturopathic Doctors – Scope of Practice, Renewals, and Professional Liability’
(X-file bill: HB 520)
(This bill provides prescriptive authority to naturopathic practitioners, aka naturopathic doctors, including for controlled and dangerous substances (CDS) in Schedules III, IV, or V, if they are listed in the “Naturopathic Doctors Formulary Council for Controlled Dangerous Substances” and approved by the Board of Physicians. The bill also allows naturopathic practitioners to prescribe, in addition, all drugs that are not CDS. Currently, naturopaths cannot prescribe prescription medicine with the exception of prescription oxygen, emergency epinephrine, and some prescription items for contraception).
MDDCSAM testimony in OPPOSITION
FAILED:
HB 1021 ‘Health Occupations – Licensed Psychologists – Prescriptive Authority’
(X-file bill: SB 568)
(This bill would grant psychologists prescriptive authority, including controlled substances, if they meet certain criteria).
MDCSAM testimony in OPPOSITION
FAILED:
SB 75 ‘Alcoholic Beverages – Class A License – Food Retailers’
(No cross-file bill)
(Would have allowed food establishments meeting certain size and other criteria to sell beer and wine. This definition incvudes most 7-11s, Royal Farms, and Highs gas stations, Costco, Sam’s, and every standard grocery store chain. This is according to testimony by the MD Public Health Association (MdPHA) against a prior iteration of this bill. MdPHA also testified that research consistently demonstrates that increased alcohol outlet density, especially those selling unopened containers, is associated with an increase in violence, criminal activity, domestic violence, and child maltreatment. It is also very costly; a recent study in Baltimore City demonstrated that alcohol-related harms cost $582 million each year. Large chain stores can lower costs of alcohol products, which can lead to increased levels of consumption and harms, and can negatively affect locally owned alcohol outlets unable to compete. It is possible that MdPHA may not be able to make these excellent points this year. MDDCSAM’s testimony presents these and arguments, including the fact that at least half of all alcohol sold is consumed in heavy drinking episodes, which are associated with harms).
MDDCSAM testimony in OPPOSITION
FAILED:
HB 766 ‘Retail Tobacco Businesses and Establishment of a Premium Cigar Lounge Alcoholic Beverages License’
(X-file bill: SB 428)
(The bill would have made exceptions, for the first time, to the state’s landmark Clean Indoor Air Act (CIAA) enacted in 2007. MDDCSAM has opposed similar bills over the years, and opposition was a top priority for public health groups including state chapters of the American Heart Association, the American Lung Association, the American Cancer Society and the Maryland Smoke-free Coalition. It was expected to pass because, this year, it had the support of leadership. The bill would affect some Maryland workers who do not want to be exposed to second-hand smoke (SHS), who may develop mild or severe symptoms from SHS (e.g., an asthma attack that can lead to hospitalization or worse), have certain health conditions such as heart or lung disease, who prefer not to increase their risk of heart disease, stroke, cancer, premature death, and possibly Alzheimer’s disease, who know they are pregnant, or do not know they are pregnant, as a condition of their employment. Also, clean indoor air protections in Maryland have been followed by robust declines in smoking rates (tobacco use disorder) more effectively than efforts prohibiting tobacco sales to minors. When smoke-free air rules were implemented leading up to the law’s enactment, between 1998 and 2010 the smoking rate in Maryland declined by 32%, double the national average).
MDDCSAM’s testimony in OPPOSITION
FAILED:
HB 417 Criminal Law – Schedule III Controlled Dangerous Substances – Medetomidine and Xylazine
The original bill provided consumer protections by prohibiting retailers from selling these drugs for non-medical purposes. MDDCSAM supported it, although it was unclear if it would have a significant impact. However, the bill was amended in the House committee to delete this content, replaced by simply putting the two drugs on Schedule III. This means there would be new criminal penalties for anyone using these drugs (wittingly or unwittingly). This type of criminalization would cause significant harms to very many individuals, and should not be used in lieu of consumer protection. MDDCSAM now strongly opposes the bill.
MDDCSAM LETTER IN OPPOSITION TO HB 417 as amended
FAILED:
SB 1008 Alcohol and Cannabis – Cannabinoid Beverages Off-Premises Sales Permit – Establishment
(This bill would expand the sale of cannabinoid beverages to any of over 1500 licensed alcohol retailers, not limited to about one hundred licensed cannabis dispensaries. Unlike the dispensaries, employees of licensed alcohol retailers have no required training on safe cannabis use (e.g., the need for warnings about cannabis use in pregnancy, etc.) It also transfers enforcement authority from the Maryland Cannabis Administration (MCA) to the Alcohol, Tobacco, and Cannabis Commission (ATCC). Unlike the MCA, the ATCC does not track products to their point of sale. The bill would degrade public health safeguards, a typical attempt at “regulatory capture” as the cannabis industry increasingly resembles Big Tobacco and Big Alcohol).
MDDCSAM testimony IN OPPOSITION
FAILED:
HB 544 ‘Vehicle Laws – Cannabis Use in Motor Vehicle With Minor Occupant – Prohibition’
(No cross-file bill)
(MDDCSAM is concerned about unintended consequences for criminal justice equity and inequitable enforcement. The bill allows for up to one year of incarceration for cannabis use in a vehicle where a minor is present. Exposing a minor to second hand smoke from smoked cannabis in a motor vehicle is already prohibited. This bill extends criminal penalties to other forms such as edibles, without a clear risk from mere proximity).
MDDCSAM testimony IN OPPOSITION
2026 BILLS THAT DIDN’T GO OUR WAY:
FAILED:
HB 808 ‘Maryland Medical Assistance Program – Step Therapy, Fail-First Protocols, and Prior Authorization – Prescription Drugs to Treat Serious Mental Illness’
(X-file bill: SB 490)
(The bill prohibits Medicaid from applying a prior authorization requirement, fail-first protocol, or step therapy protocol for medications for most mental health conditions. Currently, MD Medicaid allows only a 30-day emergency supply of atypical antipsychotics that are not on the preferred drug list. Mental health disorders are very often co-occuring with SUD and require simultaneous treatment. We point out that, for mental health disorders, (1) finding an effective medical regimen often takes time,(2) adherence to stigmatized mental health medicines is already a significant problem, and (3) an interruption in treatment can result in recurrence of severe psychiatric symptoms that can be disruptive or dangerous).
MDDCSAM testimony in SUPPORT
FAILED:
HB 360 ‘Criminal Procedure – Automated Expungement (Clean Slate Act of 2026)’
(X-file bill: SB 483)
(The bill requires the state to automatically expunge cases, i.e. remove the criminal record, if they meet certain criteria after a certain number of years has elapsed. Currently, an individual must initiate the process and pay a fee, even if convicted of a crime that is no longer a crime such as some prior cannabis-related convictions. It appears that this is also the case when the person is acquitted, charges are dismissed, and for charges such as vagrancy panhandling, public drinking, sleeping on a bench, etc. We pointed out that harms caused by having a criminal record tend to undermine treatment and recovery, employment and housing, which in turn contributes to continued criminal legal involvement in a vicious cycle that affects many of our patients with substance use disorders. And that people eligible for expungement often never start the process, that an un-expunged criminal record can continue to harm individuals and their families throughout their lifetimes, and that punishment for minor offenses should not be lifelong).
MDDCSAM’s testimony in SUPPORT
FAILED:
HB 169 Criminal Procedure – Expungement of Records – Good Cause
(X-file bill: SB 525)
(This bill allows a person to petition for expungement of a misdemeanor conviction after 5 years from the time of completion of mandatory treatment, parole, probation, or other sentence. When considering the petition, the court may grant the expungement “on a showing of good cause” including such factors as the person’s history and character, success at rehabilitation, or the impact of the criminal record on the person’s ability to secure employment, education, housing, licensing, and opportunities for economic stability, etc.
MDDCSAM’s testimony in SUPPORT
FAILED:
SB 327 ‘Drug Paraphernalia and Controlled Paraphernalia Prohibitions– Repeal’
(X-file bill: HB 551)
(Repeals the criminalization of drug paraphernalia, a long-term priority of the harm reduction community and the addiction treatment community. It goes further than similar bills in prior years. It would significantly reduce harmful arrest, fines and incarceration of people who use drugs).
MDDCSAM testimony in SUPPORT
FAILED:
HB 195 ‘State Lottery and Gaming Control Commission – Authority to Conduct Studies on the Use of Emerging Technology – Collaboration’
(No cross-file bill)
(Requires the state’s gaming commission (SLGCC) to conduct studies to enhance safety and prevent abuses in Maryland’s lottery and gaming program. This would include a mandate to study emerging technologies such as A.I., identity verification, cybersecurity, and to monitor the literature on problem gambling programs).
MDDCSAM testimony in SUPPORT WITH AMENDMENT (for a Work-group)
FAILED:
HB 295: ‘Gaming – Prohibition on Interactive Games and Revenue from Illegal Markets’
(X-file bill: SB 112)
(Interactive games, sometimes known as “sweepstakes casinos” gamify gambling, make it accessible on mobile phones, increase risk for fraud & exploitation, and may avoid consumer protections such as age verification, due to the current lack of regulation. These games use virtual coins that are exchanged for cash and often simulate casinos, lotteries or sports wagering.This bill prohibits operating these in Maryland by requiring certain gaming license holders to report to the SLGCC any business relationships with people or entities known to operate or promote such games in Maryland. It also authorizes the Gaming Control Agency to deny or revoke licenses to those who operate or promote interactive games).
MDDCSAM testimony in SUPPORT
FAILED:
HB 518 ‘Gaming – Problem Gambling and College Athlete Protections’
(No X-file bill)
(This bill …
(1) Enhances Maryland’s current program of allowing individuals to ban themselves from playing the Maryland Lottery or gambling at Maryland casinos. (The “voluntary exclusion program”). It allows the Maryland Center for Excellence on Problem Gambling to proactively offer services from a peer support specialist to individuals who make this type of request.
(2) Raises the age to participate in online fantasy gambling from 18 to 21. MDDCSAM’s proposed amendment is to eliminate the exemption for 18–20-year-olds who have an existing fantasy competition account. (Fantasy sports are known to be highly addictive).
(3) Prohibits “proposition bets” on collegiate sports events, i.e., wagering on events unrelated to the final score or outcome. These include wagering on an individual athlete’s performance which can contribute to harassment of college athletes, and is opposed by the NCAA.
(4) Requires sports wagering licensees to report de-identified transactional data to certain research institutions in order to evaluate measures to minimize the harms of sports gambling).
MDCSAM’s testimony: SUPPORT WITH AMENDMENT
FAILED:
HB 291: ‘Sports Wagering Proceeds – Promotional Play Exclusion – Limitation’
(X-file bill: HB 102)
(Authorizes the State Lottery and Gaming Control Commission to promulgate regulations limiting the amount of promotional play a sports wagering licensee can exclude from its reported proceeds as a way of reducing their taxes. Offering promotional play is known to increase the risk of gambling addiction).
MDDCSAM Testimony in SUPPORT
Below is a filterable list of prior years’ bills (2024 & 2025) and MDDCSAM testimony.
To filter, choose the category from the dropdown and press “Filter.” The page will refresh with just those bills.
| Bill Summary | MDDCSAM Testimony |
|---|---|
|
SB 215,
Cannabis Reform - Revisions
Also opposed (unanimously) by the Cannabis Public Health Advisory Council Would authorize two new types of venues (consumption sites and cannabis events) for consumption of oral cannabis, that is “edibles” and beverages,… Read More
|
MDDCSAM Testimony
Oppose
|
|
HB 12,
Cannabis - Sale and Distribution - Tetrahydrocannabinol Offenses
Closes a loophole in which THC Delta 8 and Delta 10 are unregulated, although these products can be as potent as Delta 8. Also authorizes the Alcohol, Tobacco, and Cannabis Commission (ATCC) to assist law enforcement in … Read More
|
MDDCSAM Testimony
Support
|
|
SB 824,
‘Alcoholic Beverages - Prohibition on Class A Licenses for Chain Stores, Supermarkets, and Discount Houses – Repeal
Would have allowed the sale of beer and wine in supermarkets. Also opposed by the MD Public Health Association and the MD Licensed Beverage Association. A March 5, 2025 News Article, one of many. https://marylandmatters.… Read More
|
MDDCSAM Testimony
Oppose
|
|
HB 804,
Multifamily Dwellings - Smoking Policies
Would require the governing body of a common ownership community / multifamily dwelling to develop a smoking policy that applies to all common areas. MDDCSAM felt that the bill would help prevent chronic disease in a fle… Read More
|
MDDCSAM Testimony
Support
|
|
SB 902, HB 11,
'Health Insurance - Access to Nonparticipating Providers - Referrals, Additional Assistance, and Coverage'
A priority of the Maryland Parity Coalition, removes the sunset on the law passed in 2022 which prohibited an out-of-network provider from balance-billing a patient for SUD / behavioral health services for the difference… Read More
|
MDDCSAM Testimony
Support
|
|
SB 370, HB 556,
'Drug Paraphernalia for Administration – Decriminalization'
Would have decriminalized drug paraphernalia for personal use. Also supported by Baltimore Mayor Brandon Scott's office. Syringe service programs (SSPs) in MD and elsewhere, aka needle exchange programs, provide equipmen… Read More
|
MDDCSAM Testimony
Support
|
|
HB 1066,
'Commission on Behavioral Health Care Treatment and Access - Membership and Workgroups'
Establishes a workgroup within this commission to examine outcomes of voluntary vs. involuntary SUD treatment through the criminal justice system. The use of involuntary SUD treatment has been promoted by some in the cri… Read More
|
MDDCSAM Testimony
Support
|
|
HB 798 / SB 589,
'Opioid Restitution Fund - Interactive Dashboard'
Requires the MD Office of Overdose Response (MOOR), with the MD Dept of Health, to establish and maintain an interactive public dashboard that tracks Opioid Restitution Fund spending. This is intended to encourage the us… Read More
|
MDDCSAM Testimony
Support
|
|
SB 793, HB 572,
'Public Health - Opioid Overdose Reversal Drugs'
Promoted by the manufacturer of nalmefene, the bill would require any standing order for an opioid overdose reversal drug to allow an individual to choose any FDA-approved such drug or formulation. MDDCSAM testimony revi… Read More
|
MDDCSAM Testimony
Oppose
|
|
SB 83, HB 845,
Public Health - Overdose and Infectious Disease Prevention Services Program'
Would have established OD prevention sites (aka safe injection site) in Maryland, to prevent overdose, infectious disease, and to connect some individuals to treatment if they are interested / ready. Has been unsuccessfu… Read More
|
MDDCSAM Testimony
Support
|
|
HB 1398,
Criminal Law - Distribution of Heroin or Fentanyl Causing Serious Bodily Injury or Death.
Would have created new criminal penalties for those found liable for distributing drugs that led to an overdose. MDDCSAM and other opponents testified that these penalties would most often affect family and friends of th… Read More
|
MDDCSAM Testimony
Oppose
|
|
HB 1131,
‘Public Health - Buprenorphine - Training Grant Program and Workgroup’
Allows counties to apply for grants to train paramedics to administer buprenorphine, e.g., after OD, with a workgroup to study bup access, due at year's end. Bup-after-OD by paramedics is an exciting development, only be… Read More
|
MDDCSAM Testimony
Support
|
|
SB 1009,
Task Force on Responsible Use of Natural Psychedelic Substances
MDDCSAM collaborated with the MD Psychiatric Society, proposing the same amendments, which were largely adopted. We noted our enthusiasm about possible benefits of psychedelics, but suggested that the task force should b… Read More
|
MDDCSAM Testimony
Support with Amendments
|
|
SB 1041,
Alcoholic Beverages - Breweries, Wineries, and Distilleries - Direct Delivery
|
MDDCSAM Testimony
Oppose
|
|
SB 833,
Alcoholic Beverages – Sale or Delivery for Off–Premises Consumption
|
MDDCSAM Testimony
Oppose
|
|
SB 204,
Interstate Social Work Licensure Compact.
|
MDDCSAM Testimony
Support
|
|
SB 399,
Cannabis - Advertising - Prohibited Locations
|
MDDCSAM Testimony
Oppose
|
|
HB 736,
Health Insurance and Maryland Medical Assistance Program - Coverage - Opioid Reversal Drugs and Products
|
MDDCSAM Testimony
Support
|
|
SB 1099,
Emergency Services - Automated External Defibrillator and Naloxone Co-Location Initiative - Requirements for Public Buildings.
|
MDDCSAM Testimony
Support
|
|
SB 801,
Correctional Services – Medication–Assisted Treatment
|
MDDCSAM Testimony
Support with Amendments
|
|
HB 374,
Prince George's County - Alcoholic Beverages - Cigar Lounge License PG 303-24.
Re: House Bill 374 and Senate Bill 186 Prince George’s County-Alcoholic Beverages-Cigar Lounge License. Would allow the establishment of Cigar Lounges which can also sell beer, wine, and liquor in Prince George’s County,… Read More
|
MDDCSAM Testimony
Oppose
|
|
SB 987,
Business Regulation – Electronic Smoking Devices (ESD) Manufacturers – Certifications.
The bill would establish new licenses and fees for electronic smoking device (ESD) manufacturers, wholesalers, and retailers in Maryland. It would authorize the ATCC (Alcohol, Tobacco, and Cannabis Commission) to conduc… Read More
|
MDDCSAM Testimony
Support
|
|
SB 1056,
Cigarettes, Other Tobacco Products, and Electronic Smoking Devices - Revisions (Tobacco Retail Modernization Act of 2024).
The bill (1) enhances requirements for tobacco product placement and age verification, (2) provides additional licensure requirements for the manufacture, distribution or sale of electronic smoking devices, (3) Prohibi… Read More
|
MDDCSAM Testimony
Support
|
|
HB 238,
Public Health - Clean Indoor Air Act - Revisions
Adds electronic smoking devices to the states Clean Indoor Air Act and prohibits their use in most indoor public areas and workplaces, alongside already prohibited smoking of combustible tobacco, cannabis, and hemp. Read More
|
MDDCSAM Testimony
Support
|
|
HB 1072,
ETOH Sales and Use Tax - Alcoholic Beverages - Rate Alteration
Would increase the rate of the sales tax from 9% to 10% applied to certain sales of alcoholic beverages. Read More
|
MDDCSAM Testimony
Support
|
|
SB 93,
Health Insurance- Utilization Review- Private Review Agents
Requires private review agents to adopt best practices in the criteria and standards they use for health insurance utilization reviews relating to mental health and substance use disorder (MH/SUD) benefits, provide clear… Read More
|
MDDCSAM Testimony
Support
|
|
SB 684,
Health Insurance – Mental Health and Substance Use Disorder Benefits – Sunset Repeal and Modification of Reporting Requirements.
Introduce because insurance carriers in Maryland have failed to comply with federal or state parity laws. These laws require parity in coverage between somatic disorders, and behavioral health disorders. Though carriers… Read More
|
MDDCSAM Testimony
Support
|
|
HB 474,
Criminal Procedure - Probation, Parole, and Pretrial Release
Would prohibit a court from routinely revoking pretrial release, or from a finding of parole violation, based solely on the use of cannabis. Instead, it would require a case-by-case determination as to whether cannabis … Read More
|
MDDCSAM Testimony
Support
|
|
HB 1057,
Task Force to Study the Use and Possession of De Minimis Quantities of Controlled Dangerous Substances.
Would establish a Task Force to Study the decriminalization of use and possession of small quantities of Controlled Dangerous Substances, in order to reduce the harms of arrest, fines and incarceration. Among other thin… Read More
|
MDDCSAM Testimony
Support
|
|
HB 1096,
Public Health - Overdose and Infectious Disease Prevention Services Program
Would allow communities to to establish an Overdose and Infectious Disease Prevention Program to provide a location for the consumption of pre-obtained drugs, provide sterile needles, administer first aid, and a variety … Read More
|
MDDCSAM Testimony
Support
|
|
HB 531,
Correctional Services – Parole Supervision Fees and Drug and Alcohol Abuse Test Payment – Repeal
Repeals a monthly $50 fee imposed on individuals on parole or supervised by the Division of Parole and Probation, and repeals charges for mandated drug or alcohol testing. Read More
|
MDDCSAM Testimony
Support
|
|
HB 980,
Public Health - Opioid Restitution Advisory Council and Fund - Revisions.
Requires that allocation of these funds be displayed online in a transparent fashion, as has been done in some other states. We pointed out that a lack of transparency for this spending is common in other states, and pre… Read More
|
MDDCSAM Testimony
Support
|
|
HB 833,
Parents in Substance Use Disorder Treatment – Children in Need of Assistance and Treatment Facilities
Establishes a presumption that placement with a child’s parent is in the best interest of the child, the child is receiving proper care and attention, and there is not a certain emergency situation if the child’s parent … Read More
|
MDDCSAM Testimony
Support
|
|
Budget,
2024
Governor Wes Moore introduced a budget with full funding for the Behavioral Health Administration, including more than $80 million in new investments and a 3% behavioral health provider rate increase. The General Assembl… Read More
|
MDDCSAM Testimony
Support
|
|
HB 1155,
Hospitals – Opioid Overdose and Opioid-Related Emergency Medical Conditions – Treatment
Requires all hospitals and emergency departments to establish protocols, and the capacity, to offer medication treatment to people with opioid use disorders, including those with overdose, and to provide appropriate refe… Read More
|
MDDCSAM Testimony
Support
|
Other Maryland Addiction Policy Resources
The Maryland General Assembly Website
On THE MARYLAND GENERAL ASSEMBLY WEBSITE citizens can look-up bills by year, topic, bill number, sponsor, etc. read submitted testimony, submit your own written or oral testimony (in-person or virtually) and view archived video testimony at committee hearings.
NCADD-MD
The 2025 Maryland policy Wrap-Up Report from NCADD-MD, (the National Council on Alcoholism and Drug Dependence, Maryland Chapter)
MBHC Advocacy Archives
Advocacy Archives of the Maryland Behavioral Health Coalition and its lead agency, the Mental Health Association of Maryland
UMD Legal Resource Center
A running, updated description of addiction-related and other Maryland health bills are provided by the Legal Resource Center of the University of Maryland School of Law.
